Issue 124632 - Optimize PNG files on the website
Summary: Optimize PNG files on the website
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Website general issues (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-04-08 21:02 UTC by Andrea Pescetti
Modified: 2014-04-25 18:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: Easy

Attachments
New "logo-rss-16.png" file (750 bytes, image/png)
2014-04-08 21:57 UTC, Marcus 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Andrea Pescetti 2014-04-08 21:02:30 UTC 
The largest object on the http://openoffice.org/ homepage is currently a 16x16 image file with an RSS icon, 47 KB:
http://www.openoffice.org/images/logo-rss-16.png

This wastes ~45 KB per request, so ~45 GB every day at one million visits per day.

The PNG should be optimized with any image processing program such as the GIMP, or with ImageMagick (convert, use the --colors option and no dithering), or anything. The resulting file should be attached to this issue. While at it, a cursory look at the other PNG files in the homepage would be useful.
Comment 1 Marcus 2014-04-08 21:57:41 UTC 
Created attachment 83142 [details]
New "logo-rss-16.png" file

I've attached a much smaller file:

original "logo-rss-16.png" --> 48,568 byte
new "logo-rss-16_new.png"  -->    750 byte
Comment 2 SVN Robot 2014-04-21 19:23:42 UTC 
"pescetti" committed SVN revision 1588972 
#i124632# Replace RSS logo with a much smaller file (equivalent image).
Comment 3 Andrea Pescetti 2014-04-21 19:27:08 UTC 
Thanks a lot, this was meant for a newcomer but it's good to see it fixed! A quick look at the images/ folder showed no other problematic files, so closing.

[ The SVN robot above got confused somehow: this is not fixed in Rev 0 obviously, but in http://svn.apache.org/r1588972 ]
Comment 4 Marcus 2014-04-25 18:13:09 UTC 
Now the fix is also online.