Issue 12437 - Collection of issues to get gcc 2.95 to compile on OOO_STABLE_1
Summary: Collection of issues to get gcc 2.95 to compile on OOO_STABLE_1
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Build Tools
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 644
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 RC
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@tools
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-03-18 10:54 UTC by foskey
Modified: 2003-06-18 13:15 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description foskey 2003-03-18 10:54:01 UTC 
This is a collection of issues to get the OOO_STABLE_1 branch tag to compile
under gcc 2.95.  Please add any issues that are applicable.
Comment 1 foskey 2003-03-18 10:57:20 UTC 
First issue is that bootstrap includes gcc 3 libraries without guard
conditions.  Here is a patch, still to be proven under gcc 3 though. 
Note that the LINUX test should probably be COM=GCC, I know IRIX needs
a patch here as well.

Index: static.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/util/tools/bootstrp/static.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.14.6.1
diff -u -b -B -p -r1.14.6.1 static.mk
--- static.mk   17 Dec 2002 15:10:48 -0000      1.14.6.1
+++ static.mk   18 Mar 2003 10:54:42 -0000
@@ -155,7 +155,10 @@ STATIC_LIBS+=$(DYNAMIC)
 STATIC_LIBS            += -lnsl -lsocket -lposix4 -lc
 .ENDIF
 .IF "$(OS)"=="LINUX"
-STATIC_LIBS            += -lsupc++     -lX11 -lXext
+.IF "$(CVER)"=="C300"
+STATIC_LIBS            += -lsupc++
+.ENDIF
+STATIC_LIBS            += -lX11 -lXext
 .ENDIF
  
 # -----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 2 nickb 2003-03-19 22:42:39 UTC 
Hmmm, we dont have any IRIX patches for this file. 
There is nothing explicitiy linking against libsupc++ (for IRIX),
so we should be ok (and this module seems to be compiling fine).

Also, we dont have any gcc specific patches for OOO_STABLE_1 at this
time.
Comment 3 michael.bemmer 2003-03-25 08:09:32 UTC 
Target this one for beta2.
Comment 4 nickb 2003-04-04 08:38:31 UTC 
Added gcc 2.95 bug
Comment 5 Martin Hollmichel 2003-04-29 14:27:49 UTC 
retargeting
Comment 6 foskey 2003-05-04 15:02:11 UTC 
OOO_STABLE_1 appears to compile with 2.95.  May raise issue for 644
branches later.
Comment 7 foskey 2003-06-18 13:13:03 UTC 
Verified.
Comment 8 foskey 2003-06-18 13:15:11 UTC 
Closing issue.