Issue 123985 - AOO can't start when installing on redhat-32bit
Summary: AOO can't start when installing on redhat-32bit
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 4.1.0-dev
Hardware: PC Linux 32-bit
: P3 Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
: 123984 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-01-07 07:59 UTC by liuping
Modified: 2014-01-13 03:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
1.png (30.50 KB, image/png)
2014-01-08 07:33 UTC, liuping 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description liuping 2014-01-07 07:59:15 UTC 
Build infor:
AOO410m1(Build:9750)  -  Rev. 1555657 on redhat 32-bit
Step:
1. tar -zxvf Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz_2014-01-06_04_31_12_1555657.tar
cd en-US/RPMS
2. rpm -ivh --force *.rpm
cd desktop-integration
3. rpm -ivh --force openoffice4.0-redhat-menus-4.0-9714.rpm


Issue:
Install successfully,but can't open AOO through menu and soffice

But AOO401m5(Build:9714)  -  Rev. 1524958 2013-09-20 11:41 - Linux i686 on redhat 32-bit install and open aoo successfully
Comment 1 Andrea Pescetti 2014-01-07 18:53:45 UTC 
What do you get if you run the "soffice" executable in a terminal?
Comment 2 liuping 2014-01-08 07:33:31 UTC 
Created attachment 82238 [details]
1.png
Comment 3 liuping 2014-01-08 07:33:52 UTC 
please refer 1.png
Comment 4 Andrea Pescetti 2014-01-08 09:19:04 UTC 
So it seems it reoccurred something like
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119385

I'm not 100% sure, but probably the buildbots are still using a more modern Linux distribution than the one we use for creating the release builds. Release builds are expected to run with glibc >= 2.5, see issue above.
Comment 5 liuping 2014-01-13 03:13:14 UTC 
*** Issue 123984 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***