Issue 11757 - Text does not fit into cell, if directed to 90-180 or 270-360 degrees
Summary: Text does not fit into cell, if directed to 90-180 or 270-360 degrees
Status: CLOSED IRREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 644
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: oc
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords:
: 11951 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-02-23 03:40 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-09-08 16:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
example file (please save as *.sxc) (4.82 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-02-23 03:40 UTC, Unknown 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2003-02-23 03:40:00 UTC 
Hello, folks,
Thanks for providing the valuable office suite.

When text in a cell is directed in the range of 90-180 or 270-360 degrees by
right click->Format Cells->Alignment->Degrees,
the text does not fit into the cell.
When directed in the range of 0-90 or 180-270 degrees, the text fits the cell.

Due to the issue #10735, I cannot see the behavior on Linux.

I will attach an example SXC.

Tested on 644m1/Windows 2000.
Comment 1 Unknown 2003-02-23 03:40:58 UTC 
Created attachment 4857 [details]
example file (please save as *.sxc)
Comment 2 Unknown 2003-03-01 23:14:29 UTC 
This issue occurs also with the latest 644m4 snapshot.
Comment 3 daniel.rentz 2003-03-05 13:08:13 UTC 
That is intended behaviour. In the Alignment tabpage, see the
"Reference edge" setting. It is set to "Lower cell border". In this
case, the text is rotated around the lower left cell corner. Please
set this to "Inside cell" (last image) to get your expected result.
Comment 4 daniel.rentz 2003-03-05 13:08:54 UTC 
works->closed
Comment 5 daniel.rentz 2003-03-05 13:16:05 UTC 
*** Issue 11951 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***