Issue 11543 - patch for gcc 3.2.3 to be recognised properly.
Summary: patch for gcc 3.2.3 to be recognised properly.
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Build Tools
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 644
Hardware: PC Linux, all
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 Beta
Assignee: foskey
QA Contact: issues@tools
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 11319
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2003-02-17 05:37 UTC by foskey
Modified: 2003-06-18 13:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: PATCH
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description foskey 2003-02-17 05:37:34 UTC 
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/tools/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.8.10.1
diff -u -b -B -r1.8.10.1 tg_compv.mk
--- tg_compv.mk 31 Jan 2003 15:45:29 -0000      1.8.10.1
+++ tg_compv.mk 17 Feb 2003 05:34:43 -0000
@@ -162,6 +162,11 @@
 SHORTSTDCPP3="5"
 .ENDIF
  
+.IF "$(CCNUMVER)"=="000300020003"
+LIBSTDCPP3="5.0.3"
+SHORTSTDCPP3="3"
+.ENDIF
+
 .ENDIF
 .ENDIF
Comment 1 Martin Hollmichel 2003-02-17 15:31:56 UTC 
committed
Comment 2 Martin Hollmichel 2003-02-17 18:38:23 UTC 
in cws_srx644_ooo20030223
Comment 3 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 11:13:35 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.
Comment 4 Stephan Bergmann 2003-04-02 08:13:21 UTC 
SB->Ken Foskey:  In the applied patch, is SHORTSTDCPP3="3" instead of
SHORTSTDCPP3="5" a typo or is it intentional?  In all other cases of
assigning LIBSTDCPP3 and SHORTSTDCPP3, SHORTSTDCPP3 is set to the
major number part of LIBSTDCPP3; also, a previous, obsoleted addition
of the 5.0.3 case (tg_compv.mk 1.4.2.4) used ="5" instead of ="3".
Comment 5 Stephan Bergmann 2003-04-02 08:14:54 UTC 
reassigned
Comment 6 foskey 2003-04-02 11:28:31 UTC 
The patch is correctly applied on OOO_STABLE_1 but incorrect on the
new tree.  It compiles correctly in both places so the correct patch
is fairly obvious.

Rerunning a tinderbox on the new tag cws_srx644_ooo20030412 and then
will commit patch.
Comment 7 foskey 2003-04-04 14:18:12 UTC 
APplied to tree.
Comment 8 foskey 2003-06-18 13:09:59 UTC 
Closing.