Issue 110659 - cross-references to footnotes within sub-documents don't work
Summary: cross-references to footnotes within sub-documents don't work
Status: CONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: formatting (show other issues)
Version: OOo 3.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: AOO issues mailing list
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-04-06 23:38 UTC by skelem
Modified: 2017-05-20 11:19 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
master document (Master.odm) (13.08 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2010-04-06 23:42 UTC, skelem
no flags Details
1st subdocument, footnote_crossreference.odt (22.92 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2010-04-06 23:43 UTC, skelem
no flags Details
2nd sub-document (ch1.odt) (23.25 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2010-04-06 23:43 UTC, skelem
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description skelem 2010-04-06 23:38:56 UTC
Cross-references to footnotes aren't being resolved properly when a sub-document
is included in a Master document.

I have attached 3 files: one master document and two sub-documents.
All 3 files have footnotes.
The sub-documents have two tables each.
The sub-documents have cross-references within their own files to footnotes in
those same files. (Insert/fielDs/Other/Cross-References/Footnotes, insert
reference to Reference).
Each table has (at least) 3 columns. The right-most column has either a footnote
or a cross-reference to a footnote. The 2nd column from the right indicates what
the footnote or cross-reference should be when the document is included in a
master document. The 3rd column from the right indicates what the footnote or
cross-reference should be when the document is viewed separately.

The first sub-document has its cross-references resolved properly. This can be
seen in the first two tables.

The second sub-document has its cross-references improperly resolved. Tables 3
and 4 show this. In Table 3, the row starting with a "3" should have the
cross-reference (the superscript after I0) of "8", but "7" shows up instead.
When viewed as a separate document, the superscripted cross-references in the
last two lines of the first table are properly resolved to "2". As the 2nd
sub-document, these two lines should have the superscript "8".

In Table 4, things get even worse. (Besides being wrong, the results are
different on different rows of the table.) The table rows starting with "4",
"3", "2", "1", and "0" are supposed to refer to footnote 11, but some end up
being resolved to "7" and one as "9".
Comment 1 skelem 2010-04-06 23:42:11 UTC
Created attachment 68786 [details]
master document (Master.odm)
Comment 2 skelem 2010-04-06 23:43:26 UTC
Created attachment 68787 [details]
1st subdocument, footnote_crossreference.odt
Comment 3 skelem 2010-04-06 23:44:00 UTC
Created attachment 68788 [details]
2nd sub-document (ch1.odt)
Comment 4 eric.savary 2010-04-17 09:43:55 UTC
@OS: duplicate of issue 11174?
Comment 5 skelem 2010-04-19 19:21:11 UTC
Yes, I think it is a duplicate of 11174.

Bug 11174 has been around since 2003!
There are around a dozen duplicates of that bug and many people complaining
about having to hand-edit cross-references in order to publish a document.

Please fix this!
Comment 6 Marcus 2017-05-20 11:19:53 UTC
Reset assigne to the default "issues@openoffice.apache.org".