Issue 11001 - PDF-Export: Deletions are not striked trough in PDF output
Summary: PDF-Export: Deletions are not striked trough in PDF output
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: gsl
Classification: Code
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 644
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P4 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: OOo 1.1 Beta2
Assignee: h.ilter
QA Contact: issues@gsl
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-01-28 06:51 UTC by sreindl
Modified: 2003-05-20 10:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Test Document (5.28 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-01-28 06:52 UTC, sreindl 		no flags Details
pdf output (10.39 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-01-28 06:53 UTC, sreindl 		no flags Details
sample output with 644/m4 (10.09 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-03-11 21:50 UTC, sreindl 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description sreindl 2003-01-28 06:51:09 UTC 
When I export a document with recorded changes to PDF, the color highlighting
and the revision marks at the side appear but the deletions are not striked
trough. This is causing confusion when reading the PDF output later on.
Comment 1 sreindl 2003-01-28 06:52:37 UTC 
Created attachment 4450 [details]
Test Document
Comment 2 sreindl 2003-01-28 06:53:18 UTC 
Created attachment 4451 [details]
pdf output
Comment 3 philipp.lohmann 2003-01-28 09:08:21 UTC 
fixed in 644, underline, strikethrough, etc were not implemented in 643
Comment 4 sreindl 2003-03-11 21:49:17 UTC 
color hightlighting and revision marks are working fine. What I'm
missing is the colored underline feature seen on the screen. In the
PDF file the color for the underlined changes is black. This might be
confused with the regular underline feature.

This isn't the same severity as of the last problem therefore I
reduced the priority.

BTW: Testsystem is 644 m4 now
Comment 5 sreindl 2003-03-11 21:50:41 UTC 
Created attachment 5057 [details]
sample output with 644/m4
Comment 6 christof.pintaske 2003-03-12 10:56:44 UTC 
cp->pl: please have a look. does it work correctly in our postscript
printout ?
Comment 7 philipp.lohmann 2003-03-27 15:46:03 UTC 
i'll change that
Comment 8 philipp.lohmann 2003-03-27 16:13:47 UTC 
fixed in CWS vcl07
Comment 9 philipp.lohmann 2003-04-04 10:32:47 UTC 
fixed in vcl07
Comment 10 h.ilter 2003-04-07 14:25:15 UTC 
Fixed.
Comment 11 h.ilter 2003-04-07 14:25:57 UTC 
Verified with 644m7s1_8576 (cws:VCL07) = ok
Comment 12 thorsten.ziehm 2003-05-20 10:46:25 UTC 
Verified in OOo1.1 Beta2.