Issue 108033 - more email recipients in mail merge does not work
Summary: more email recipients in mail merge does not work
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 65458
Alias: None
Product: Writer
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: OOO320m8
Hardware: Unknown Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: writerneedsconfirm
QA Contact: issues@sw
URL:
Keywords: needmoreinfo, oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-01-02 16:30 UTC by veselpet
Modified: 2010-01-05 22:41 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description veselpet 2010-01-02 16:30:31 UTC 
If I want to add more then ONE email recipient for sending merge mails via 
email, it does not work. The error is "Invalid recipient". I tried to separate 
them by colon and semicolon, with space or without. OO could not proceed more 
than ONE single recipient. How this could be solved? In Cc and Bcc it works 
well, but not in the Send to field.
Comment 1 Rainer Bielefeld 2010-01-05 10:42:51 UTC 
I do not understand the problem.

@veselpet:
Before you file further issues or post again here, please read our guidelines on
<http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/pre_submission.html> and  
<http://www.openoffice.org/bugs/bug_writing_guidelines.html>, then
contribute a clear step by step instruction containing all observations (error
messages ...), _every_key_press_and_every_mouse_click_ how to reproduce the
problem, and explain why you believe that your results are unexpected.
That means (for example): 
 do not write something like „I am not able to ...“, but
 „6. left mouse click on …
     expected: …, color of … changes, … 
     actual: no …., color remains white, no …

Screenshots might help to explain the problem.
Comment 2 h.ilter 2010-01-05 22:40:59 UTC 
Double to issue 65458

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 65458 ***
Comment 3 h.ilter 2010-01-05 22:41:47 UTC 
Closing duplicate.