Issue 1054 - installation fails to register some DLL's and crashes
Summary: installation fails to register some DLL's and crashes
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: Installation
Classification: Application
Component: code (show other issues)
Version: 632
Hardware: PC Windows 98
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: falko.tesch
QA Contact: issues@www
URL:
Keywords:
: 1150 (view as issue list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-06-19 13:55 UTC by issues@www
Modified: 2003-12-06 14:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description issues@www 2001-06-19 13:55:56 UTC 
I installed build 632 without removing the previously installed build 627.
During the "registering" phase, there were two messages that some DLL could not 
be registered (sorry, I did not write down their names) and finally the install 
program crashed, see below.

SETUP caused an invalid page fault in
module CFGMGR2.DLL at 015f:02776556.
Registers:
EAX=0162f664 CS=015f EIP=02776556 EFLGS=00010202
EBX=00000000 SS=0167 ESP=0162f638 EBP=0162f68c
ECX=00000000 DS=0167 ESI=0000000c FS=327f
EDX=00c01fbc ES=0167 EDI=019f5784 GS=0000
Bytes at CS:EIP:
8b 11 8d 45 e0 50 51 ff 52 10 8d 4d e8 83 c4 28 
Stack dump:
0162f664 0000000c 0162f664 019f5784 0162f674 00000000 00000000 02762310 
019f5784 0162f6ec 00000000 00b24760 00c01fc0 00c06220 00b240d0 00b260b0 

Best regards, Simon.
Comment 1 issues@www 2001-06-19 14:08:34 UTC 
after the previous version was removed, the installation now completed without 
these problems.
Comment 2 Olaf Felka 2001-06-19 15:25:51 UTC 
I've tried to install on Win2000, WinME and Win98. No problem: it makes no difference wether a 627 was installed or not, installation runs without any error message or crash.
Assumption: you have used the same directories?
If yes, please don't do so. At this state of developing there might be such important changes that there might be incompatibilities between the builds.
Comment 3 issues@www 2001-06-26 08:23:17 UTC 
Olaf, just for the record, yes, I used the same directory.
Comment 4 Olaf Felka 2001-07-02 09:02:29 UTC 
*** Issue 1150 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 Olaf Felka 2001-07-04 08:22:34 UTC 
invalid -> closed
Comment 6 issues@www 2001-07-21 12:01:20 UTC 
In response to Olaf, 2001-06-19, I'd suggest the default directory be set to
C:\..\OpenOffice632 (or whatever the version number is), rather
than ...\OpenOffice60. The latter would be reserved for when the production
version comes out.
Comment 7 Olaf Felka 2001-07-24 08:28:18 UTC 
Hi Falko,
Is this possible?
Comment 8 falko.tesch 2001-09-17 13:13:29 UTC 
Simple answer: No.
Comment 9 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 18:06:08 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is
unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 10 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 18:14:37 UTC 
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.