Issue 103846 - Spreadsheet application hangs when pressing CTRL-X
Summary: Spreadsheet application hangs when pressing CTRL-X
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 101869
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: editing (show other issues)
Version: OOO310m11
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: spreadsheet
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-07-27 21:47 UTC by ernsts
Modified: 2009-08-05 21:07 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
Test case; mark lines 6,7,8 and press CTRL-X. (8.39 KB, text/plain)
2009-07-27 21:49 UTC, ernsts
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description ernsts 2009-07-27 21:47:49 UTC
In some cases, when multiple lines are selected and CTRL-X is pressed, the
spreadsheet application hangs with 100% CPU load.
The problem occured on both systems running Windows XP (SP3, german) and Ooo 3.1
(german) with a very simple test scenario.

Fill the following cells:
A1:  1
A2:  2
A3:  3
A4:  4
A5:  5
A6:  =SUMME(A1:A5)
A7:  =A6*1,19
A8:  =A7+3,05

Mark the complete lines 6,7,8 by clicking on the line numbers on the left side.
Press CTRL-X.
Result: Application hangs with 100% CPU consumption.
Comment 1 ernsts 2009-07-27 21:49:17 UTC
Created attachment 63811 [details]
Test case; mark lines 6,7,8 and press CTRL-X.
Comment 2 Rainer Bielefeld 2009-07-28 06:05:26 UTC
I checked "ooocrash.ods" with "Ooo 3.1.0 WIN XP multilingual version German UI
activated  [OOO310m11 (Build 9399)]" and can confirm the reported effect.

DUP of Issue 101869?

Related to Issue 94267, Issue 95038?
Comment 3 Rainer Bielefeld 2009-07-28 08:28:22 UTC
I checked with  "Ooo Dev 3.2.0 multilingual version English UI WIN XP:
[DEV300m53 (Build 9412)]" (where fix for Issue 101869 "calc50" has been
integrated) and can no longer reproduce the reported hang.

After detailed examination of Issue 101869 I now am pretty sure that this one is
a DUP of Issue 101869.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 101869 ***
Comment 4 Mechtilde 2009-08-05 21:07:30 UTC
duplicate -> closed