Issue 1016 - "Search" returning Very High Weirdness
Summary: "Search" returning Very High Weirdness
Status: CLOSED WONT_FIX
Alias: None
Product: Infrastructure
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: Mailing lists (show other issues)
Version: current
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Unknown
QA Contact: issues@www
URL: http://graphics.openoffice.org/projec...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-06-07 19:26 UTC by Unknown
Modified: 2003-12-06 14:52 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description Unknown 2001-06-07 19:26:19 UTC
Look at this URL.  It's all wrong, yet it works:

http://graphics.openoffice.org/project/www/www-discuss/current/msg00105.html

www-discuss in the *graphics" project??  Michelle found it like so (see below - 
it almost sounds like the discuss archive was getting written to the wrong 
place for awhile?  I know that makes no sense...)

Kat, can you dig around a little and tell us what happened?

*******
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michelle Milledge <Michelle.Milledge@Sun.COM>
To: louis@collab.net, goolie@collab.net
Subject: Discuss Archive

Hi,

I found this message

http://graphics.openoffice.org/project/www/www-discuss/current/msg00105.html

Problem 1:
It is dated Oct 13.  When I go to the index for Oct 13, I don't find any mails
from this guy.  Am I crazy?

Problem 2:
When I click on Date Index, it takes me to January.

Wait, New problem.  Why is the url in Graphics?  This is a discuss mail.  I
found this by searching for shakespeare and then following the thread.

mystery.
m
**************
Comment 1 Unknown 2001-06-07 19:45:21 UTC
Stop the presses.  I think i understand.

for a clue, see:

http://porting.openoffice.org/project/www/www-discuss/current/msg00105.html
http://l10n.openoffice.org/project/www/www-
http://openoffice.org/project/www/www-discuss/current/msg00105.html

and to drive my point home:

http://l10n.openoffice.org/project/porting/porting-dev/current/msg00105.html

etc.  See, they all work.  It seems that the server doesn't care about making 
sure these are "well formed" strings.  It has something to do with the vhosting 
mechninism; that which makes http://porting.openoffice.org point to 
http://openoffice.org/project/porting

Anyway, michelle, you've just found an odd artifact of the way vhosting 
interacts with mail archive URLs, but nothing is "wrong" as far as i can tell.  
Comment 2 Unknown 2001-06-07 19:47:09 UTC
I shouldn't say "fixed"...
Comment 3 Unknown 2001-06-07 19:50:33 UTC
I"m going to resoved it as "wontfix", since the behavior is going to remain 
unchanged and while a bit confusing, i don't think it's worth assigning 
resources to fix (since nothing is really "broken")
Comment 4 Unknown 2001-06-07 19:52:27 UTC
This does not explain why clicking on Date index for an October mail takes me to
an index page with January mails.
:(
Michelle
Comment 5 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 18:11:02 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved duplicate
issues. Please see this posting for details. First step in IssueZilla is
unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 6 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 18:11:23 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for
details. First step in IssueZilla is unfortunately to set them to verified.
Comment 7 michael.bemmer 2003-03-11 18:18:33 UTC
As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.