Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | Arbitrary X-aksis and X-aksis for each dataseries | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Calc | Reporter: | ballelarsen <finn> |
Component: | ui | Assignee: | bjoern.milcke |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | issues@sc <issues> |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues |
Version: | 641 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | Windows 98 | ||
Issue Type: | ENHANCEMENT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- |
Description
ballelarsen
2001-12-02 20:36:22 UTC
Already on the wish list, see http://graphics.openoffice.org/chart/featurewishes.html This issue is re-assigned to Christian Jansen for further evaluation. INCJ (Im Not Christian Jansen:) Like Oliver wrote this feature is alredy on the chart wish list. Will be a decision will be made later. Is it worth using a vote on a "RESOLVED" issue? If nothing else the help and intial chart insert dialog should explain the restriction in functionality. I thought that it was going to be put on the wish list - so I thought that a vote would still help. Someone on the users list is really asking for this - I have the developer build and I don't see it yet. Do you know what the status is? Is there another bug for this feature? Sorry, I followed your link from the users list, but thought I would ask whether it was worth using my vote It wasn't a comment on yours Having dataseries with sperate X,Y values plotted, is the single most useful feature of chart !! it means you can compare two X,Y datasets. This is very important. I don't understand why this hasn't been implemented yet ! (1.1.4) *** Issue 20972 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** CJ: Reopened. Set target to Later. CJ->BM: This might be something for the new chart. PLease have a look. Thanks. changed priority to p3 Although this issue is older than issue 3997, the later one is the better known issue with the same topic (and over 50 votes), so I set this one to duplicate to Issue 3997. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 3997 *** see Issue 3997 |