Issue 10150

Summary:

Please add some configure/Makefile changes to support Linux for S/390

Product:

porting

Reporter:

Unknown <non-migrated>

Component:

code

Assignee:

foskey

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

issues@porting <issues>

Severity:

Trivial

Priority:

CC:

issues

Version:

OOo 1.0.1

Target Milestone:

OOo 1.1 Beta

Hardware:

Other

OS:

Linux, all

Issue Type:

PATCH

Latest Confirmation in:

---

Developer Difficulty:

---

Issue Depends on:

8385

Issue Blocks:

11319

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Contains configure and Makefile changes for Linux for S/390.	none

Description Unknown 2002-12-17 09:00:00 UTC

The attached file contains some configure and Makefile changes and #defines to
support the new Linux for S/390 platform. These changes are already incorporated
into the Debian packages and work fine.

Comment 1 Unknown 2002-12-17 09:07:26 UTC

Created attachment 4068 [details]
Contains configure and Makefile changes for Linux for S/390.

Comment 2 foskey 2002-12-19 21:57:17 UTC

The configure.in changes are redundant on OO643C so they have not been
applied.  The set_soenv patches have been applied to OO643C in
preparation for the migrations sign-off.  If you want to apply
immediately config_office changes to ports they are approved.

unxlngs3904.mk is fine to apply, os390 only and it looks fine.

psprint/source/fontsubset/sft.h  is os390 specific, approved.

tools/inc/solar.h approved os/390 only.
setup2/source/custom/jvmsetup/unx/jvmscan.cxx approved, os390 only.

Comment 3 Unknown 2002-12-20 14:24:42 UTC

Thanks for the approval. I assume that solenv/inc/unx.mk is also
approved, though you didn't mention it explicitly.

Comment 4 Unknown 2003-02-09 17:52:12 UTC

Patch committed to branch cws_srx644_ooo20030223.

Comment 5 Martin Hollmichel 2003-02-10 09:18:24 UTC

hi ken, please approve the autotool part.

unx*390*.mk is approved.

Comment 6 foskey 2003-02-11 20:50:26 UTC

The config_office part has been applied a while ago.

Can this issue be closed?

Comment 7 Unknown 2003-02-12 19:41:26 UTC

I haven't tested it yet on 644 and would like to apply it also to the
STABLE branch. Is this possible even if the issue is closed?

Comment 8 Unknown 2003-02-13 06:01:58 UTC

I have committed the stuff, but not yet tested.

Comment 9 Martin Hollmichel 2003-02-17 16:46:20 UTC

in cws_srx644_ooo20030223

Comment 10 michael.bemmer 2003-03-13 11:12:00 UTC

As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved
<wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details.