Issue 9113

Summary: Numbered paragraphs don't export to HTML correctly
Product: Writer Reporter: osavill <osavill>
Component: codeAssignee: eric.savary
Status: CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE QA Contact: issues@sw <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P4 CC: issues
Version: OOo 1.1 RC2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: All   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
Incorrect para. num. handling in OOo --> HTML export
none
Incorrect para. num. handling in OOo --> HTML export
none
Incorrect para. num. handling in OOo --> HTML export none

Description osavill 2002-11-08 16:57:53 UTC
Paragraphs with Numberings don't get exported to HTML correctly. This is especially bad with sub paragraphs (e.g. 1.1, 1.2 etc.)
Comment 1 eric.savary 2003-06-27 17:57:50 UTC
Can't reproduce in OOO 1.1beta2
Reopen if needed (and add a zipped sample doc with the description of
what is "not correctly saved")
Comment 2 eric.savary 2003-06-27 17:57:59 UTC
closed
Comment 3 stefan.baltzer 2003-07-02 16:21:54 UTC
.
Comment 4 osavill 2003-07-02 20:59:20 UTC
It does still happen. File attached. 
Comment 5 osavill 2003-07-02 21:00:06 UTC
It does still happen. File attached.  
Comment 6 osavill 2003-07-02 21:01:25 UTC
Created attachment 7349 [details]
Incorrect para. num. handling in OOo --> HTML export
Comment 7 osavill 2003-07-02 21:02:29 UTC
Created attachment 7350 [details]
Incorrect para. num. handling in OOo --> HTML export
Comment 8 osavill 2003-07-02 21:02:46 UTC
Created attachment 7351 [details]
Incorrect para. num. handling in OOo --> HTML export
Comment 9 osavill 2003-07-02 21:12:37 UTC
Sorry, igonore try.sxw !! The correct file is try1.sxw 
 
If some nice person would remove try.sxw that it would be much 
appreciated - thanks. 
Comment 10 jack.warchold 2003-08-08 15:52:09 UTC
jw: changed owner to es
changes status to confirmed
changed OS to All
changed version to RC2
changed target to OOo 2.0
changed Priority to P4

reproduced with OOo 1.1
Comment 11 eric.savary 2003-09-23 17:14:39 UTC
It's a limitation of HTML which does not support #.#.#. numbering format.
Comment 12 eric.savary 2003-09-23 17:14:58 UTC
closed