Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | I would appreciate more formula formatting possibilities | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Math | Reporter: | palecekj <jpalecek> |
Component: | ui | Assignee: | AOO issues mailing list <issues> |
Status: | CLOSED NOT_AN_OOO_ISSUE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | Trivial | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues, oooforum, thomas.lange |
Version: | OOo 1.0.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | Other OS | ||
Issue Type: | ENHANCEMENT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- |
Developer Difficulty: | --- |
Description
palecekj
2002-09-11 15:21:38 UTC
It is possible to define more large operators using user defined symbols. Please have a look at http://documentation.openoffice.org/user_faq/formula/006.html But I agree that the examples you mention are so common, that they should be predefined. I would propose adding the following keywords. bigunion, bigintersection, bigand (or bigwedge), bigor (or bigvee), bigotimes, bigoplus, bigodot. They should be "large operator" versions of the existing binary operators, so the example U {2*k} k in setZ would be written bigunion from {k in setZ} \{ 2*k \} Reassigned to Bettina. It already functions: oper %SIGMA from {k in setZ} {2*k} If you like to have a union character get displayed the one thing you need to do is use "Tools / Catalog - Edit" to define a new user-defined character named UNION that is set to display a non italic union symbol from the OpenSmbol/StarSymbol font. After that oper %UNION from {k in setZ} {2*k} will display exactly what you want. TL->BH: What could probably be done is to modify the syntax of the "oper" command to allow for the use of the characters/operators that already have a name. The functionality will be the same. But maybe it is somewhat more convenient... I have not enough mathematical background to follow this discussion. Jiri, Henrik and Thomas, can you please make new issues for each of Jiri's wishes with detailled instructions how the results should look? For example, a user-defined solution with suggestion how to be included into the stadard would be helpful. I do not see any chance that this "formua editor should be more comfortabe issue" has any chance to get STARTED. So if I will not see any further action as votes, attachments or confirmations in this issue, I will have to close this issue 2003-08-31 as WFM. Rainer I will not close this issue, but only leave it in the actual "enhancement black hole". Removed myself from CC Rainer . |