Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | compiler optimisation runtime errors | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Calc | Reporter: | sparcmoz <sparcmoz> | ||||
Component: | code | Assignee: | ooo | ||||
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@sc <issues> | ||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues | ||||
Version: | OOo 1.1 RC5 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Sun | ||||||
OS: | Linux, all | ||||||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
sparcmoz
2003-11-27 10:18:45 UTC
Created attachment 11583 [details]
fix runtime errors
Hi Niklas, one for you. Frank Adjusting target milestone Reassigning to Eike. Not sure if there are really that many independent problems, or if there's a common cause that should be found and fixed instead. i have a plan, but it is slow because i do not have much time. the debian package for linux sparc is nearly ready and then we might get some more helpers since i think debian is where most linux sparc users are lurking. (a) these problems go away if i compile with no optimisation. (b) -O1 is enough to cause these problems. (c) i compile with -O3 hoping that will force more problems to be revealed. (d) that might help find a common factor, (e) next step is for porting (me) to try and isolate the code where the problems exist in each cases, i will try and do this in my xmas holiday (f) meanwhile the current patch is needed to get calc through qatesttool Patch accepted. However, as Niklas already stated, I also think there probably will be some common cause. The whole thing resembles much the -fno-strict-aliasing problem we encountered (by enabling optimizations without specifying that switch, which crashed in accessing the "casted offsets" of ScAddress). Btw: As all the other Linux SPARC patches went into some OOo1.1.1 branch, shouldn't this one also go there? Currently it's targeted to OOo2.0 jim@sun:~$ locale -a C en_US en_US.iso88591 POSIX jim@sun:~$ sorry ignore that Hi Jim, Will do ;-) However, what about my comment if OOo1.1.x wouldn't be the proper target instead of OOo2.0? Eike I would be happy to see this done in 1.1.x thank you. There is one more of these (ouch) at issue 23229, i am not sure the correct steps to send it to you. Align target with other Linux SPARC patches, OOo1.1.1 On branch cws_fix645_ooo111fix2 sc/source/core/data/makefile.mk 1.6.260.1.38.1.2.1 sc/source/filter/excel/makefile.mk 1.18.80.1.2.1.2.1 verified in 112fix1, i will close this one and make a new issue some day to investigate the optimisation problem. closed Created attachment 73530 |