Issue 20638

Summary: Tab to zero on first-line-negative-indent fails on loaded document.
Product: Writer Reporter: rri0189 <jwkenne>
Component: codeAssignee: frank.meies
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: issues@sw <issues>
Severity: Trivial    
Priority: P3 CC: issues
Version: OOo 1.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows NT   
Issue Type: DEFECT Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
Sample file referred to in text none

Description rri0189 2003-10-03 02:23:31 UTC
If a paragraph has a negative indent for the first line,
and the first (only) tab is at zero,
and there is a tab in first line of data,
and the document has just been loaded,
the tab does not go where it should (to the main left-margin point).

Load the attached document.  Note how the verse reads:

Name. This is the first line.
          This is the second line.
          This is the third line.

Now, right-click on one of those verse paragraphs.
Pick "Edit Paragraph Style".
Pick the Tab tab of the dialog box.
Don't actually change anything.  Just hit "OK".

Now all the verse reads, correctly:

Name.     This is the first line.
          This is the second line.
          This is the third line.

You can save the document now, if you like.  But when you load it again, the
tabs will be screwed up until you do the above bypass again.

Spooky, huh?
Comment 1 rri0189 2003-10-03 02:24:09 UTC
Created attachment 9914 [details]
Sample file referred to in text
Comment 2 jack.warchold 2003-10-20 15:00:09 UTC
confirmed on OOo1.1

reassigend to jw
set target to OOo 2.0
set satus to new
Comment 3 jack.warchold 2003-10-20 15:01:47 UTC
.
Comment 4 jack.warchold 2003-10-20 16:06:33 UTC
after talking to sba
reassigend to fme
set target to office later
Comment 5 rri0189 2003-10-22 00:20:35 UTC
Did I mention that the bollix also applies to printing?  So it isn't
safe simply to load and print any document bitten by this bug?  So the
bypass has to be executed _every_ _time_?  Assignment to "OOo Later"
does not look good to me.
Comment 6 frank.meies 2004-01-15 12:06:13 UTC
.
Comment 7 frank.meies 2005-01-28 12:03:44 UTC
.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 4540 ***
Comment 8 frank.meies 2005-01-28 12:04:43 UTC
.