Issue 14781

Summary:	Installed Java Not Detected During Installation
Product:	Installation	Reporter:	jcmonty <monty>
Component:	code	Assignee:	Olaf Felka <olaf-openoffice>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	issues@installation <issues>
Severity:	Trivial
Priority:	P3	CC:	issues, kelvineld
Version:	OOo 1.1 Beta2
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows 2000
Issue Type:	DEFECT	Latest Confirmation in:	---
Developer Difficulty:	---

Description jcmonty 2003-05-23 07:12:43 UTC

The Java runtime environment or SDK was not detected during installation of OOo
1.1 beta2.

Comment 1 Olaf Felka 2003-05-23 08:55:11 UTC

Which jave version should have been detected?
On my machine JRE 1.4.0, ~.1 and ~.2 has been detected.

Comment 2 kelvine 2003-05-23 10:32:25 UTC

Hi,

Just thought I would add that I experienced that to.

Installing OO1.1beta2 did not recognise java not matter what I did. 
Browsing to folder etc.  OO1.0.3.1 was working fine with java.

The version of java I had was java1.4.0.01 I believe.

I downloaded a later version java 1.4.1.02 and now it works fine.

I think this small version difference is something few would expect.

My machine is running Windows XP Home.

Resolved as WORKSFORME seems a bit odd with three people now 
reporting the same problem.

Hope this helps

Kelvin

Comment 3 nicu_ooo 2003-05-23 11:17:58 UTC

i see this issue reported in the unconfirmed bug 14775
i commented in that bug:
>on my Windows98 installation, Java 1.4.0_01 was also not recognized,
>then i updated to the latest version, 1.4.1_02 and was recognized.
>unfortunately, is not specified in the Release Notes or Readme the
>minimum requirement for Java

Comment 4 Olaf Felka 2003-05-23 11:26:46 UTC

The java requirements have been changed for beta 2. The setup
recognizes these versions:
1.4.0_02, 1.4.0_03 etc.
1.4.1_01, 1.4.1_02 etc.
1.4.2 etc.
1.4.1 is excluded because it does not contain a fix necessary for
accessibility.

Comment 5 Olaf Felka 2003-05-23 11:31:08 UTC

It's not odd that I write that it works for me, even when it works for
me. And when I get such a short bug description I need a crystal ball
to reproduce the issue.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 14775 ***

Comment 6 Olaf Felka 2003-05-23 11:31:34 UTC

Duplicate

Comment 7 llester 2003-05-23 11:40:34 UTC

Also seen in Linux installation

Comment 8 laimis 2003-06-25 22:06:46 UTC

I am experiencing the same problem and getting ready to install jre
1.4.1.02