Issue 13900

Summary:

Graphics and text is not well embedded in header

Product:

Writer

Reporter:

sgautier.ooo

Component:

Assignee:

michael.ruess

Status:

CLOSED DUPLICATE

QA Contact:

issues@sw <issues>

Severity:

Trivial

Priority:

CC:

issues

Version:

OOo 1.1 Beta

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

OS:

Windows 2000

Issue Type:

DEFECT

Latest Confirmation in:

---

Developer Difficulty:

---

Attachments:

Description	Flags
file to open with OOo	none
how doc should looks like	none
Sorry I have joined a bad example, this one is the good one.	none

Description sgautier.ooo 2003-04-28 15:48:59 UTC

Hi, 
This document (attached) come from Word, when we open it under OOo text and
graphics are not well positionned in the header.
I join the OOo file and a sreen-shot from the doc under word.
Best - Sophie

Comment 1 sgautier.ooo 2003-04-28 15:50:32 UTC

Created attachment 5934 [details]
file to open with OOo

Comment 2 sgautier.ooo 2003-04-28 15:52:29 UTC

Created attachment 5935 [details]
how doc should looks like

Comment 3 sgautier.ooo 2003-04-28 17:33:17 UTC

Created attachment 5938 [details]
Sorry I have joined a bad example, this one is the good one.

Comment 4 h.ilter 2003-04-30 12:38:09 UTC

I'll check this.

Comment 5 thorsten.ziehm 2003-05-06 10:56:43 UTC

Set to OOo 1.1 RC

Comment 6 h.ilter 2003-05-08 15:20:56 UTC

HI->MRU: Seen on your machine, there is someting wrong with Word. 
Word-XP load the doc also incorrect.

Comment 7 michael.ruess 2003-05-20 09:41:52 UTC

The z-order of the objects is also shown wrong when opening the file
in Word2000 or WordXP. So there's nothing to fix for us.

Comment 8 michael.ruess 2003-05-20 09:46:09 UTC

MRU->AMA: The import won't look better after import if the following
compatibiity mode will not be implemented:
In Header/Footers graphics in MS Word are always wrapped though they
have the wrapping set to "Top and Bottom" (which matches Writer's "no
wrap".

Comment 9 michael.ruess 2003-05-28 14:58:36 UTC

*** Issue 9139 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

Comment 10 andreas.martens 2003-05-28 15:39:12 UTC

For me looks like a duplicate of 13832, doesn't it? If you agree we
should close this one.

Comment 11 michael.ruess 2003-05-30 10:37:47 UTC

Yes, this here describes exactly the same as issue #13832. Thus I
close this one here as duplicate.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 13832 ***

Comment 12 michael.ruess 2003-05-30 10:38:03 UTC

Closed.