Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
Summary: | PDF Export does not handle Type 1 fonts correctly. | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | gsl | Reporter: | behrends <behrends> | ||||||
Component: | code | Assignee: | h.ilter | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@gsl <issues> | ||||||
Severity: | Trivial | ||||||||
Priority: | P2 | CC: | issues | ||||||
Version: | 644 | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | OOo 1.1 Beta2 | ||||||||
Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
OS: | Linux, all | ||||||||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||||
Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
behrends
2003-02-19 00:00:49 UTC
Created attachment 4790 [details]
Broken PDF file that shows the font embedding problem.
cp->pl: problem with encoding != latin1 ? I think we need to adress this asap after basetech01 is in dry towels pushed on pl's stack Set to "confirmed", because this bug obviously occurs. will fix It may be an encoding problem, then again it may be something else. Where can one get ZurichMT-Roman from ? The MT ending sounds like MonoType ? I don't think i'll see what happened here purely from the PDF file (which is post mortem). Zurich is Bitstream's Univers clone (which I can't include for copyright reasons), but the bug occurs with any Type 1 font that I tried. I'll attach a complete set of files (.sxw, .pdf, .pfb, .afm) using the Insula font from http://www.apostrophiclab.com/. Created attachment 4822 [details]
Set of files exhibiting the Type 1 font embedding bug.
There was a "slight misinterpretation" about binary and ascii hex data inside type1 fonts :-( ; namely the identification which of both is present worked only in special cases. This is fixed now in CWS vcl06 pl->hi: fixed in CWS vcl06 set traget to beta2 Fixed Verified with 644m6_8563 (CWS:VCL06) = ok As mentioned on the qa dev list on March 5th I will close all resolved <wontfix/duplicate/worksforme/invalid> issues. Please see this posting for details. *** Issue 36167 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** |